Northern Ireland Assembly Flax Flower Logo

Northern Ireland Assembly

Monday 11 December 2000 (continued)

Mr McFarland:

I sit on the Regional Development Committee, and, with family roots in Tyrone, I have used this road through Toome for most of my adult life.

This is an important development as it is a key access route to the west of the Province. However, we are now hearing that there is no money available for this, and it may have to be put back. That was not always so, and listening to Mr McCrea we hear revisionism at its best. We had a press release on 25 January, wherein Minister Robinson announced, quite clearly - and there was no question about it then - that the Toome bypass would be built. He went to the O'Neill Arms to produce an exhibition and unveil plans. He even had a very public row with Mr J Kelly to make sure it made the headlines on the news that night. He went into enormous detail about the length of the bridge and how this would be and that would be. However, the new Minister, Mr Campbell, claims that there is no money for funding. At that stage there was no doubt at all, and this was the Department for Regional Development's press statement:

"Funding for the bypass is being provided from the 1998 Chancellor's Initiative, which announced investment for the physical infrastructure in Northern Ireland."

There was no doubt at that stage - no doubt at all - that this was to happen.

The question is "What is the game?" You could argue that Minister Campbell has been hung out to dry and has been left to carry the rap for a complete volte-face in the Department. With friends like these, who needs enemies? Mr McCrea told how he has been after this for 20 years. I wonder who was the MP for Mid Ulster for many of those 20 years. The only reason we are able to have Minister Campbell bringing this development forward is that the Ulster Unionist Party produced the agreement. Otherwise we would still be looking for funding for all this.

Is there now an opportunity for Mr Campbell to do some lateral thinking? Perhaps there is a chance to look at the Toome bypass as a public-private partnership (PPP) - to develop it as a toll road. You could argue that it is clearly defined, it is outside the village and people will have a choice of coming through the village or taking the faster route. It would save £13 million of Mr Campbell's budget. Has he thought about that? He tells us regularly that there is no money for roads - they are underfunded - and he is absolutely correct. There is a serious crisis in Roads Service. Does his vision of the future include looking at alternatives, now that he has this opportunity of a complete turnaround - no money when Mr Robinson said there was? Perhaps he will comment on that when he gets the opportunity.

Mr Molloy:

Go raibh maith agat, a LeasCheann Comhairle. I support the motion from my Colleague Mr John Kelly, Assembly Member for Mid Ulster. I reaffirm our position that the Toome bypass should be put in place as quickly as possible. It is a long-awaited scheme, and we have heard how long people have been lobbying about it.

Unfortunately, the then MP for the area did not deliver that particular scheme, even when at the time he was propping up the Conservative Government. Even when he was maintaining his own position and theirs, and allowing them to continue to run down the services and the infrastructures, he could not extract a concession from them to make funds available for this simple bypass.

The scheme itself cannot be delayed any longer. It has been planned for a long time. People living west of the Bann have suffered decades of discrimination by the Stormont regime and the British Government. We are talking about discrimination not against Catholics, but against the people of the west - Catholics, Protestants and Dissenters. They have all lived in that area.

From early on in the Unionist regime there was an awareness that repartition might be considered at some future stage. Therefore nothing at all was developed in the west. All the infrastructures, all the industries and all the hospitals were put east of the Bann. The attitude was that the rest of the population could come to the east if it wanted to avail of those services. However, the people were not provided with the necessary infrastructure to come and get the good of those services.

If one looks at the river Bann on the map one will see that the M2 stops just beyond Antrim, the M1 at Dungannon, and the railway at Portadown. There is no infrastructure right across from east to west.

Mr Leslie:

The Member's point is very interesting. Does he agree that the same east-west divide is highly apparent in the Republic of Ireland - so much so that it has repartitioned the country itself for purposes of positioning the west of the country better for EU grants?

Mr Molloy:

I agree completely. I could not have put it any better myself. We have often said that the west of Ireland has been discriminated against by the Dublin regime, by Stormont and by the British Government. In the South we now see a rebalancing. They are actually talking about repopulating the west of Ireland. We need to ensure that the same happens in the North and we will get repopulation of the Six Counties, so that we will get a fair distribution of resources, infrastructure and wealth.

Mr McElduff:

I want to draw the attention of the Member, and that of the Minister, to the Omagh throughpass. Just like the Toome bypass, it is deemed to be at risk and may be deferred as a result of the 15 November announcement. I find it very unusual that the Member for South Antrim - sorry, the Member for Mid Ulster - Mr McCrea, was putting the onus on all the other parties to secure funding for the Toome bypass and these other road schemes. The Minister's self-exclusion from the Executive table has cost many communities the money for these schemes.

Mr Molloy:

I agree. Not only has the Minister not come to the Executive and argued for the money to be made available, but the previous Minister took advantage of the situation by making the announcement, laying down the plans and leaving it to the Executive to provide the money. He knew that he was not going to be there for the second round. He simply left Mr Campbell to clean up afterwards.

We are now in a situation where we do not have the Minister who announced it, and we do not have the funds to deliver it, because there was no plan in place to ensure that the Executive would support it. It was simply a public relations announcement by Mr Peter Robinson at that time.

The village of Toome has suffered severely. It has been destroyed by pollution, traffic congestion and noise. The quality of life has been affected. Even the plaque that Mr McClelland was looking for would be splashed all over if it were put up at the moment, given the amount of traffic that is going through the village.

We have to take all that into account if we are going to improve the situation and improve the quality of life for the villagers. One of the things that we have found down through the years is that villagers often feel that their village will be destroyed by putting a bypass around it. In this situation the village has been destroyed by the failure to put a bypass around it, and the failure to put the bridge in place. We need to address this problem. This is one of the main east/west arterial routes.

It is important that this bridge is put in place and that the infrastructure is developed. Not only is this the main east/west arterial route, but it is also the main arterial route for the DUP/LVF spokesperson from Mid Ulster, South Antrim, or wherever he is currently representing. He now travels between one constituency and the other, so it is vital that this bridge be built, for that would allow him to move between his constituencies quickly.

If we are going to develop the west - and this is one of the main issues we need to address - we have to have the necessary infrastructure. Industrialists say that they cannot get their goods out or their materials in. If TSN is to mean anything in this Assembly, and if the Executive is sincere in trying to implement it, we need to target social need by providing adequate finances and resources. I ask Members to support this. It is unfortunate that the people who caused the whole east/west problem in the past are badly represented in the Chamber. There are only three Members - [Interruption]

Mr Deputy Speaker:

I have to stop you, Mr Molloy.

Minister, are you prepared to give up a short amount of your time to your predecessor, Mr Peter Robinson? In other words, you will have nine minutes between you.

Mr P Robinson:

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. It is normal - [Interruption]

Mr Deputy Speaker:

The Member - [Interruption]

Mr P Robinson:

I am on a point of order.

It is normal that when spurious or ill-founded comments have been made about a Member, that Member has a right to respond. Instead of coming to me, you went to the Sinn Féin/IRA representative. That is the issue. I do not wish to take up the Minister's time, but I think that you, Mr Deputy Speaker, should have given me time to answer the points that had been made against me personally.

Mr Deputy Speaker:

You have taken up very well the time that I was prepared to give you.

Mr J Kelly:

A LeasCheann Comhairle, on a point of order. Was the Member's name on the list to speak?

Mr Deputy Speaker:

Yes.

Mr P Robinson:

That was not the answer you wanted, was it?

The Minister for Regional Development (Mr Campbell):

The notes that I prepared before the debate have been borne out by most of the Members' speeches, in that virtually everyone is agreed that Toome needs a bypass. It would improve journey times and reliability on the vitally important trans-European route between Belfast and the north-west, and it would also deliver environmental, community and safety benefits by substantially reducing the amount of traffic travelling through the village of Toome. I want to assure the House that my Department and I are keen to deliver a well-designed solution as soon as possible.

The proposed scheme is for a 3·5-kilometre - that is just over two miles - dual carriageway bypass to the north of Toome. The estimated cost is £13 million, and the likely contract period is 18 months. To ensure that local people were fully consulted about this scheme, my predecessor, Mr Peter Robinson, opened an exhibition in the village in January of this year. Good progress has been made since then, and the following steps have been and are being taken.

During the statutory planning process, the direction order attracted one objection, but this was resolved by negotiation. The Committee for Regional Development and I have approved the direction order, and it will become operative in February 2001. That will complete the planning procedures.

The statutory environmental procedures have been completed without objection, and a notice to that effect will appear in the press later this week. That will allow my Department to proceed to the next stage of the statutory process, which is the vesting order stage. Roads Service has made an initial visit to all the relevant landowners, and I understand that they have proved co-operative so far. It is planned to publish the notice of intention to make a vesting order next month.

My Department has further demonstrated its commitment to the scheme by advertising for project management consultants to oversee the design and construct contract. It is intended to appoint the consultants in the next 10 days, and the value of that scheme is about £400,000. I also plan a 16-week site investigation contract, to start next month, to obtain detailed ground survey information along the route of the bypass. That contract is valued at £100,000. An advertising - [Interruption]

Rev Dr William McCrea:

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Is it in order for people to instigate a debate like this and then not listen to the answers that are being provided?

5.15 pm

Mr Deputy Speaker:

That is not a point of order.

Rev Dr William McCrea:

It is a point of order.

Mr Campbell:

Also, there was advertising last week for horticultural contractors to undertake a contract to harvest and propagate local seeds to provide native planting to be used in the subsequent landscaping of the new road. That is a Northern Ireland pilot of a new UK-wide initiative.

I want to pay tribute to Roads Service staff, and their consultants, for all of their work to date. If all goes well with the land acquisition, the design and construct contract could be advertised in the summer of 2001, with the successful contractor undertaking the detailed design in the autumn and starting work on the ground early in 2002.

However, despite all the progress that has been made, it is vital that my Department receives sufficient funds so that this and the other schemes in the major works preparation pool can proceed on schedule. Clearly, insufficient funds could delay the start date of some of these key schemes.

This matter seems to have escaped the notice of some Members, despite the fact that my predecessor sent them a letter on 20 July which not once, not twice, not three times, not four times, but five times indicated that these schemes would proceed subject to finance being available. It was stated five times in the one letter.

The recent Budget statement by the Minister of Finance and Personnel announced draft allocations for the year 2001-02. That was done since my hon Friend, the previous Minister for Regional Development, made the announcement about the exhibition in Toome. However, using the normal financial planning assumptions, it seems that the funding available to my Department for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04 may not be sufficient to enable construction to start on all the schemes in the preparation pool which it is anticipated will be ready to start in that period.

I felt it important to make members of the Regional Development Committee aware of the possible funding shortfall when I met them on 15 November, and I welcome the opportunity today to discuss the matter further in this Adjournment debate.

With regard to the Toome bypass, I want to make it clear that when my predecessor, Peter Robinson, opened the consultation exhibition in Toome last January the scheme was subject to the statutory procedures and the availability of funding. I want to make that crystal clear, and I hope to have to say it only once - not five times. That is the case for every major works scheme. There is no scheme that I know of that proceeds irrespective of funding - none. If people do not understand that, then I do not know what they would understand.

Similarly, when I advised the Regional Development Committee several weeks ago of a possible funding shortfall, that was not a cancellation or a postponement of any scheme. It was merely a statement of the obvious: to build roads, I need resources. I am convinced that, through our consultations with local people and with our extensive environmental studies, we have come up with a bypass scheme that is an excellent solution to a very serious problem as well as being a scheme which enjoys widespread support throughout Northern Ireland.

I have no wish to delay or defer this important project. I am aware of the benefits that it will bring. I am sure that with the goodwill and support of this House the necessary finance can be made available to my Department in the years 2002 and 2003 in order to allow it and the other vital schemes in my major works preparation pool to proceed as soon as is practically possible. I hope to receive the support of this House to get the necessary resources so that these roads can be constructed.

One or two political comments have been made about where I would, or would not, go in order to get the necessary resources. I will do all in my power to ensure that these roads are built. The one constraint that I am faced with in ensuring that I get the resources is the manifesto election pledge upon which I was elected. I will not be departing from that.

Adjourned at 5.20 pm.

<< Prev

TOP

5 December 2000 / Menu / 12 December 2000