Homepage > The Work of the Assembly > Committees > Justice > Minutes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMITTEE FOR JUSTICE
|
AYES |
ABSTAIN |
---|---|
Lord Browne | Mr Raymond McCartney |
Mr Thomas Buchanan | Ms Carál Ní Chuilín |
Mr Paul Givan | Mr John O'Dowd |
Mr Alban Maginness | |
Mr Conall McDevitt |
Lord Morrow did not participate in the vote.
Clause 40 – Possession of fireworks, flares etc
The Committee considered correspondence from the Department of Justice regarding the inclusion of “laser pens” within clause 40. The Committee noted that there were difficulties with including laser pens in the legislation but that the Minister of Justice would ensure that the importance of controlling such devices at sports grounds is recognised and will take the issue forward with relevant departments.
The Committee considered Clause 40 as drafted.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Clause 40 put and agreed to”.
Clause 41 – Being drunk at a regulated match
The Committee discussed clause 41. While the Committee did not disagree with the objective of the clause it believed it was unnecessary as there was already adequate legislation in place and the provision was likely to be unenforceable.
“Question: That the Committee is not content with Clause 41 put and agreed to”.
Clause 42 – Possession of drink containers, etc.
The Committee discussed Clause 42 and expressed strong reservations regarding whether it was necessary. The Committee was of the view that it would be difficult to enforce and impractical to work.
“Question: That the Committee is not content with Clause 42 put and agreed to”.
Clause 43 – Possession of alcohol
The Committee considered a proposal from the Department of Justice to amend the commencement of this clause to be subject to affirmative procedure and require full Assembly consent (this amendment would be achieved by changing the commencement provisions in clause 103).
The Committee was of the view that this clause created unnecessary criminal offences and self-regulation by the relevant bodies was preferable.
“Question: That the Committee is not content with Clause 43 put and agreed to”.
Clauses 44 – Offences in connection with alcohol on vehicles
The Committee considered a proposal from the Department of Justice to amend clause 44 to remove the offence of being drunk on specified vehicles entirely and remove the restrictions on alcohol on vehicles travelling away from a game.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Clause 44 as amended as follows”.
Clause 44, page 28, line 32, leave out ‘or from’
Clause 44, page 29, line 6, leave out subsection (5)
Clause 44, page 29, line 15, leave out paragraph (c)
The Committee divided: Ayes 5; Noes 0; Abstain 3
AYES |
ABSTAIN |
---|---|
Lord Browne | Mr Raymond McCartney |
Mr Thomas Buchanan | Ms Carál Ní Chuilín |
Mr Paul Givan | Mr John O'Dowd |
Mr Alban Maginness | |
Mr Conall McDevitt |
Lord Morrow did not participate in the vote.
Clause 45 – Sale of tickets by unauthorised persons
The Committee considered a proposal from the Department of Justice to withdraw clause 45 in favour of self regulation by the sports bodies and supported this approach.
“Question: That the Committee is not content with Clause 45 put and agreed to”.
Clauses 46 – 48 Banning Orders
The Committee considered Clauses 46 to 48 as drafted.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Clauses 46 to 48 put and agreed to”.
The Committee divided: Ayes 5; Noes 0; Abstain 3
AYES |
ABSTAIN |
---|---|
Lord Browne | Mr Raymond McCartney |
Mr Thomas Buchanan | Ms Carál Ní Chuilín |
Mr Paul Givan | Mr John O'Dowd |
Mr Alban Maginness | |
Mr Conall McDevitt |
Lord Morrow did not participate in the vote.
Clauses 49 – Banning orders: “violence” and “disorder”
The Committee considered a proposed amendment to Clause 49 from the Department of Justice to include sectarianism more explicitly in the provisions.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Clause 49 as amended as follows:
Clause 49, page 33, line 6 after ‘up’ insert ‘sectarian hatred or’
Clause 49, page 33, line 8, leave out ‘religious belief’
Clause 49, page 33, line 14, leave out subsection (3) and insert:
‘(3) For the purposes of this section sectarian hatred is hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or political opinion.’
The Committee divided: Ayes 5; Noes 0; Abstain 3
AYES |
ABSTAIN |
---|---|
Lord Browne | Mr Raymond McCartney |
Mr Thomas Buchanan | Ms Carál Ní Chuilín |
Mr Paul Givan | Mr John O'Dowd |
Mr Alban Maginness | |
Mr Conall McDevitt |
Lord Morrow did not participate in the vote
Clauses 50 to 55 Banning Orders
The Committee considered Clauses 50 to 55 as drafted.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Clauses 50 to 55 put and agreed to”.
The Committee divided: Ayes 5; Noes 0; Abstain 3
AYES |
ABSTAIN |
---|---|
Lord Browne | Mr Raymond McCartney |
Mr Thomas Buchanan | Ms Carál Ní Chuilín |
Mr Paul Givan | Mr John O'Dowd |
Mr Alban Maginness | |
Mr Conall McDevitt |
Lord Morrow did not participate in the vote.
Schedule 3 – Regulated Matches
The Committee considered an amendment, proposed by the Department of Justice, to Schedule 3 paragraph 8 to remove sports grounds at which there is a stand requiring a safety certificate thereby ensuring that the provisions only apply to matches at designated grounds.
The Committee considered Schedule 3 as amended.
“Question: That the Committee is content with Schedule 3 as amended as follows:
Schedule 3, page 81, line 7, leave out from ‘or’ to end of line 9
Schedule 3, page 81, line 19, leave out from ‘or’ to end of line 21
The Chairman thanked David Mercer and he left the meeting.
The clause-by-clause consideration was recorded by Hansard
Janice Smiley, Head of Criminal Policy Unit and Paul Black, Criminal Policy Unit joined the meeting at 5.40 p.m. to provide further information and clarification, if necessary, on Part 6 of the Justice Bill.
The Committee reviewed the evidence provided on Part 6 – Alternatives to Prosecution and sought further information and clarification from the departmental officials on clauses 64, 65, 67, 73, 74, 76, 77, 80, 82 and 83.
The Departmental officials advised the Committee that the Minister of Justice intended to propose an amendment to the Bill in relation to clause 82 as requested by the Committee so that the Code of Practice would be subject to affirmative resolution. The draft amendments would be provided to the Committee for consideration as soon as possible.
5.56 p.m. Paul Givan left the meeting.
The Chairman thanked Janice Smiley and Paul Black and they left the meeting.
Robert Crawford, Head of Public Legal Services and John Halliday, Criminal Legal Aid Policy Advisor joined the meeting at 6.02 p.m. to provide further information and clarification, if necessary on Part 7 - Legal Aid etc - of the Justice Bill.
The Committee reviewed the evidence provided on Part 7 - Legal Aid etc and sought further information and clarification from the departmental officials on clauses 85, 89 and 90.
The Committee considered correspondence from the Minister of Justice regarding the Committee’s recommendation that the legal aid regulations in Clauses 85 and 89 should be subject to draft affirmative procedure. The Minister outlined concerns regarding the proposal and indicated that he was not minded to make such an amendment.
Agreed: The Committee agreed request that draft amendments be prepared so that the legal aid regulations in clauses 85(2) and 89(2) would be subject to draft affirmative procedure.
The Chairman thanked the officials for the briefing and they left the meeting.
The evidence session was recorded by Hansard.
(i) The Committee noted correspondence from the Minister of Justice regarding the recent intelligence led searches in Maghaberry Prison.
(ii) The Committee considered correspondence from the Department of Justice regarding the Autism Bill.
Agreed: The Committee agreed to forward the correspondence to the Health Committee.
(iii) The Committee noted correspondence from the Department of Justice regarding a consultation on the Review of Community Sentences.
None.
The next meeting will be held on Thursday 3 February at 2.00 p.m. in the Senate Chamber, Parliament Buildings.
6.23 p.m. The meeting was adjourned.